ChatGPT genuinely changed what you can do for free. The honest comparison: AI is good for drafts and polish; it's weaker at positioning and senior judgment. Here's where each one wins.
Wins at
Loses at
Wins at
Loses at
Some yes, most not directly - but ATS systems are increasingly trained to flag low-information resumes that match the AI pattern (heavy buzzwords, weak metrics, generic structure). Recruiters absolutely can spot it. Senior recruiters see 50+ resumes a day and the AI pattern is recognizable to them.
Three things. (1) Polish - fixing grammar, tightening sentences. (2) First drafts - taking your raw experience notes and turning them into resume-shaped bullets. (3) Cover letter starting points. For all three, AI is a real productivity gain.
Five things. (1) Knowing what hiring managers at a specific company / level actually care about. (2) Cutting bullets that don't earn their place (AI bias is to keep everything). (3) Achieving the right tone for senior/executive positioning (AI defaults to overconfident generic). (4) Surfacing numbers and outcomes you actually have but didn't think to mention. (5) Holding a coherent positioning thesis across the whole document.
For entry-level and early-career? Often yes - combine ChatGPT with a strong template and you'll get something usable. For mid-career and above where positioning and judgment matter, you'll likely want a real writer involved before the final version goes out.
Yes. Share your draft and target roles. We review accuracy, positioning and readability, then develop the agreed documents around your experience.
Every package is personally written and supported by a personal review and the revisions included in your selected package.
Allow Google Analytics to measure visits and enquiries? The enquiry form works without it. Privacy policy